Samsung portable ssd t5 vs t7 full#
Samsung portable ssd t5 vs t7 Pc#

That's actually a tad slower than my T5 speeds, which came in at 24MB/s read and 41MB/s write respectively.

Regardless of whether I used its bundled USB-C to USB 3 or USB-C to USB-C cable with my XPS 15 laptop, the results from AS SSD's 1GB 4K random test were pretty much identical, coming in at a rather measly 17MB/s read and 37MB/s write. Here, the T7 Touch was pretty disappointing. They chuck it all over the shop, making random speed tests a much better indicator of what you'll see day-to-day. Indeed, most SSDs don't read and write their data in nice, neat, sequential blocks. You see, while the T7 Touch's sequential speeds are indeed roughly twice as fast as Samsung's T5, coming in at 866MB/s read and 856MB/s write over USB-C, its random read and write speeds left a lot to be desired.ДЄfter all, sequential speeds aren't a particularly good indicator of what you'll see in everyday use. I've yet to test the Crucial and Adata in full, but I'm not sure they'll actually have that much difference on my overall verdict. Unless you really want that fingerprint reader, I'd probably say not.

Can the Samsung T7 Touch really be worth all that extra money? The Adata SC680, meanwhile, is even cheaper, available for just ВЈ72 for the top 480GB size. The Crucial X8, for example, will set you back ВЈ113 for its entry-level 500GB capacity and ВЈ155 for its top 1TB model. That said, even if you're buying a new external SSD with a bit of future-proofing in mind, the T7 Touch is still considerably more expensive than its other USB 3.2 Gen 2 rivals.

Samsung portable ssd t5 vs t7 Pc#

My laptop does at least have one USB-C port to see what the T7 Touch is truly capable of, but unless you're in the process of upgrading your PC right this second, there's a good chance you probably won't be in a position to make the most of it. Indeed, my PC's Asus Prime Z370-P motherboard only has USB 3.1 ports, as does my Dell XPS 15 laptop, which I bought at the end of 2018. This only supports the USB 3.1 Gen 2 standard, admittedly, as does the ВЈ90 (512GB), ВЈ150 (1TB) and ВЈ300 (2TB) WD My Passport, but unless you've got a bang-up to date laptop or PC motherboard at your disposal, you'll probably find that most of your USB ports are still only USB 3.1 ports anyway. The Samsung T5, on the other hand, can still be had for ВЈ81 (500GB), ВЈ144 (1TB) and ВЈ296 (2TB). There will also be a non-Touch version coming out in May, which supports the same USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard but ditches the fingerprint reader, but with no word from Samsung on how much that's going to cost yet, it's difficult to say how much cheaper it's going to be as a result. The Samsung T7 Touch does, however, cost a lot more, with the 500GB model coming in at an eye-watering ВЈ130, while the 1TB and 2TB models are set to cost ВЈ196 and ВЈ366 respectively when it launches at the end of January (US pricing TBC). It's a lot smaller than Crucial's X8, too, and generally looks and feels like a proper premium bit of kit. It's an infinitely nicer thing than WD's My Passport SSD, and I much prefer it to the similarly-sized but flimsy-feeling plastic casing of the Adata SC680. I mean, the T5 was already quite a looker, but the T7 Touch is bloody lovely.

Samsung portable ssd t5 vs t7 full#

Is it necessarily a better buy than the T5, though? Here's wot I think.ДЄvailable in 500GB, 1TB and 2TB sizes in either black or silver, the Samsung Portable T7 Touch (to give it its full and proper name) is by far one of the most attractive external SSDs I've ever laid eyes on. Only now it has a fancy fingerprint reader for extra security and supports the nippier USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard, leading to sequential read and write speeds that are almost twice as fast as its T5 predecessor. Like the Samsung T5 before it, this titchy drive has a lovely, sleek aluminium chassis that's roughly the same size as a couple of stacked credit cards. The Samsung T7 Touch is the latest member of Samsung's portable SSD family.